Research has been ongoing now for years as scientists have tried to determine whether stem cells from adult tissues have the same capabilities and potential as embryonic stem cells. Studies are constantly revealing new information and it is hoped that therapeutic applications will be developed from both sources. The question, however, perhaps remains: which source holds the advantage?
Adult stem cells are generally less flexible and versatile than embryonic stem cells. Embryonic stem cells have a far greater differentiation potential than adult stem cells simply because embryonic stem cells can develop into almost every type of cell in the human body. Conversely, adult stem cells may only develop into a limited number of cell types, so their potential applications are not as great as embryonic stem cells. Newer studies do, however, suggest that adult stem cells may have greater plasticity than was originally thought, which means that they may be able to differentiate into a greater range of specialized cell types. At present, however, it would appear that embryonic stem cells still have the advantage in their ability to differentiate more readily than adult stem cells.
Is More Better?
In the case of stem cells, the answer is yes, assuming that more stem cells still means viable, high quality ones. Embryonic stem cells are capable of almost unlimited division, or proliferation, when placed in a culture whereas adult stem cells do not multiply so readily. The difficulty level varies as well; embryonic stem cells can be grown fairly easily in the laboratory whereas adult stem cells are not easily grown after isolation from mature adult tissues. Stem cell replacement therapies require large numbers of cells and the current difficulty in growing large numbers of adult cells means that their use for therapy at present is limited.
Effect on Recipient’s Immune System
Adult stem cells hold a distinct advantage in that a patient’s own cells are identified, isolated, grown and transplanted back into the patient. The recipient’s immune system does not reject the cells because they are compatible with that person’s body. With embryonic stem cells, the potential for immune rejection would require strong immune suppressing drugs to combat rejection of the new cells. This then puts a patient at risk for any microscopic diseases that may be present in the transplanted cells, as well as other diseases that could be present in the hospital environment.
A Question of Cell Youth
Adult stem cells are more likely to have abnormalities from DNA mutations, which can occur due to any number of factors. The ‘youth’ of embryonic stem cells means that they are less likely to carry mutations and they also regenerate much more quickly than adult stem cells.
Since adult stem cells are derived from adult tissues and, of course, with consent from the patient, there is little, if any, ethical dilemma to adult stem cell therapies. Embryonic stem cells, on the other hand, have triggered enormous debate due to the destruction of an embryo following cell extraction. Also, embryo destruction has essentially become entangled in the abortion debate, creating a mass of controversy between religious leaders, politicians and the public.
Despite the ethical issues, embryonic stem cells show an overwhelmingly higher potential to Treat Disease. However, research should still continue with adult stem cells. It is possible that researchers will discover ways to develop adult stem cells with more success as well as find ways to improve how they function once transplanted into the human body. Recent evidence indicating that adult stem cells may have more potential than was previously thought means that adult stem cells should continue to be researched alongside embryonic stem cells. Ultimately, it’s a case where both stem cell sources can be valuable to prolonging and saving human life.